Every number, traceable to abenchmark.

Speech-to-text, text-to-speech and real-time translationperformance across 240 languages - measured on publicdatasets and blind evaluation panels, never estimated.

3.10%

Composite WER on 8 OpenASR benchmarks, 45% below best published

240

Unique languages across both tiers, 96.8% of global population

2,970

Directed translation pairs live for Indian languages, 10 first-ever

1.90

Avg. blind rank for Indian TTS across 23 languages, ahead of Google & Cartesia

45% fewer errors than the nextbest published system.

Composite WER of 3.10% across 8 standard OpenASR benchmarks for theUniversal tier, and a macro WER of 24.6% across 16 Indian languages and7 datasets - four of which had no prior ASR coverage at all.

CapabilityUniversal tierIndian Languages tier
Supported languages204 (~96.8% global population)55 (16 on public benchmarks, 4 first-ever)
Composite / Macro WER3.10%24.6% macro / 11.9% Hindi
Relative gain vs best baseline45% (OpenASR)14% vs IndicWhisper, 40% vs NVIDIA Conformer-CTC Large
Latency (xRT)0.0068 (~146× real time, A100)Comparable, confirming on target hardware
StreamingYes, ~200ms partialsYes, same engine wrappers
Speaker diarizationYes - in productionYes - same diarization layer

WER by benchmark - Universal ASR vs. NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B

Lower is better. Source: OpenASR leaderboard, October 2025.

LibriSpeech Clean
audiobooks, clear speech
0.71%
1.42%
50% better
SPGISpeech
financial earnings calls
1.1%
1.9%
42% better
TedLium
ted talks
1.43%
2.71%
47% better
LibriSpeech Other
audiobooks, noisy audio
2.17%
2.87%
24% better
AMI
meetings
4.19%
9.12%
54% better
VoxPopuli
parliament speech
4.34%
5.63%
23% better
GigaSpeech
mixed web audio
4.99%
9.43%
47% better
Earnings22
earnings calls
5.83%
9.53%
39% better

Composite across all 8 benchmarks: 3.10% for Shunya vs. 5.63% for Canary-Qwen 2.5B - a 45% relative reduction.

SystemLanguagesComposite WER
Shunya Universal ASR2043.10%
OpenAI Whisper Large v3995.40%
NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B35.63%